|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Justin Robertson (zulu
linux.com)Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 20:05:45 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Previous message: Cor Bosman: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- In reply to: Cor Bosman: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yeah it's good. Thanks for the concern though. :)
Justin Robertson
<zulu
linux.com>
On 6 Mar 2000, Cor Bosman wrote:
> zulu
linux.COM (Justin Robertson) writes:
>
> Hi Justin, did you make sure that your LVD HD is actually running at 80MB/s
> and not at 10MB/s? Ive seen this happen quite often. Sometimes you need to
> fiddle with the scsi bios.
>
> (scsi0:0:0:0) Synchronous at 80.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 15.
>
> Cor
>
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Previous message: Cor Bosman: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- In reply to: Cor Bosman: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]