|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Justin Robertson (zulu
linux.com)Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 10:21:25 CST
- Next message: Louis-David Mitterrand: "DNS lookups on an ISDN-connected host"
- Previous message: Vivek Khera: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- In reply to: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
!! Why didn't I think of hardware level caching, agh! Thanks for the
input.
Justin Robertson
<zululinux.com>
On 6 Mar 2000, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> Den 05-Mar-00 03:39:45 skrev Justin Robertson følgende om "SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...":
> > Using fsstone and smtpstone, I've noticed some 'quirks' in performance.
> [cut low-end IDE disk is much faster than high-end SCSI disk on an
> otherwise identical system]
>
> Difficult to say. You are not giving much information about the disk
> subsystem, so this is pure speculation: The IDE disk has write-back cache
> enabled while the SCSI disk has it disabled.
>
- Next message: Louis-David Mitterrand: "DNS lookups on an ISDN-connected host"
- Previous message: Vivek Khera: "Re: Is this possible with postfix?"
- In reply to: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Justin Robertson: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]