|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance...
From: Dan Hollis (goemon
sasami.anime.net)Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 16:29:02 CST
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: "alias database loop" ???"
- Previous message: Scott Smith: ""alias database loop" ???"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Remember, all software sucks. Some sucks more, and some sucks less.
> But it sucks regardless. If I want to see something elegant I go
> look for a piece of art.
Can we stop whinging about how OS x y or z sucks, and instead get back to
whinging about how postfix sucks? :>
-Dan
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: "alias database loop" ???"
- Previous message: Scott Smith: ""alias database loop" ???"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Dan Hollis: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Reply: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: SCSI, U2W in particular?, and poor performance..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]