|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: [OT] broken mailers (was: smtpd_banner without ESMTP)
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 08:15:14 CST
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: t-online and/or gmx"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "[OT] SSH vs. SSL wrappers (was: Postfix + ssh == _great_ mobile email!)"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: [OT] broken mailers (was: smtpd_banner without ESMTP)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthew Hawkins <matthew
topic.com.au> writes:
> Following internet standards is irrelevent, what it boils down to at the
> end of the day is PHB 1 being able to talk to PHB 2 in the fastest time
> possible. This will mean making _your_ mail server not reject mail from
> non-compliant systems it should rightfully reject from. And 20 years
> down the track the internet has fallen to pieces because the standards
> that exist for compatibility are completely ignored, and the PHB's will
> be wondering why they spend all that money on IT infrastructure that has
> come to a dead end.
...that has been subverted for inferior reasons by abused monopoles if
you want my opinion. You know Microsoft won't fix broken bulbs, they
will make them standard.
-- Matthias AndreeHi! I'm the infamous .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: t-online and/or gmx"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "[OT] SSH vs. SSL wrappers (was: Postfix + ssh == _great_ mobile email!)"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: [OT] broken mailers (was: smtpd_banner without ESMTP)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]