|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: [OT] solid-pop3d
From: Ian C.Sison (ian.s
qsr.com.ph)Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 20:42:56 CST
- Next message: Ian C.Sison: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Previous message: Adam Shand: "[OT] solid-pop3d"
- In reply to: Adam Shand: "[OT] solid-pop3d"
- Reply: Ian C.Sison: "Re: [OT] solid-pop3d"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> sorry for posting about this here, but this is one of the only places i've
> seen it discussed at all. it looks like a great piece of software,
> supporting all the best bits of the various pop daemons that are around
> (maildir, expiry, virtual domain config etc) but now that i've started to
> play with it it seems very rough around the edges, which concerns me about
> putting it into production.
>
> is anyone actually using this in production? on a large scale, high load
> system?
>
> sorry for taking up peoples time, but i'd love to hear some testimonials if
> anyone is using this and it's at least a tiny bit relavant since it's one of
> only two pop daemons i'm aware of which support maildir.
>
> thanks,
> adam.
>
> ps. more info on solidpop at: http://solidpop3d.pld.org.pl/
Well, that's what i was wondering as well, as i plan to deploy it to a 50K
users postfix+POP system. I'm afraid i've got no choice, as i don't want to
use qmail's popper, and don't want to use any patched POP mailbox server.
Tough choices, really. If there are problems, then maybe i'll just hack the
code.
- Next message: Ian C.Sison: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Previous message: Adam Shand: "[OT] solid-pop3d"
- In reply to: Adam Shand: "[OT] solid-pop3d"
- Reply: Ian C.Sison: "Re: [OT] solid-pop3d"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]