|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: maildrop & postfix
From: Scott Smith (scott
versity.com)Date: Fri Mar 10 2000 - 01:51:52 CST
- Next message: Joerg Klaas: "Mails beeing merged...?"
- Previous message: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- In reply to: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Next in thread: Scott Smith: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Reply: Scott Smith: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
> What do you mean by database - Relational DB like Oracle ?
> wouldn't you prefer a Directory Server ( i.e. LDAP )
database being a very generic term
> for that matter won't Postfix + LDAP + Cyrus IMAP scale to above 60K users?
> Isn't there anyone on the list doing this already ?
probably not much more than that without hacking Cyrus deliver to deliver
to a user on a different machine. Multiple machines storing user data is
really the key, and is what every large mail hosting company I know of has
done (I've worked for two, and ironically they both started off by hacking
qmail).
If you really want a lot of users on a machine, it's a good idea to get
any actual mail transport agent off the machine, and delegate that to
other dedicated machines.
Scott
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> >
> > > At 3:54 PM +1100 2000/3/10, Andrew McNamara wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you want to support 64k users without employing someone with coding
> > > > skills, talk to Software.com or Sun, and expect to pay too much.
> > >
> > > Problem is, software.com is one of the biggest pieces of dog
> > > excrement I have ever had this misfortune to encounter, and while
> > > Netscape Enterprise Messaging Server or Sun's SIMS might scale to 60k
> > > users, they won't scale much beyond 60k.
> > >
> > >
> > > However, there are companies that have the tools to build a
> > > complete messaging system that can serve at least tens of millions of
> > > customers today and should scale to at least hundreds of millions of
> > > customers. However, they don't yet have a mailserver-in-a-box that
> > > you can buy (they have to tailor it to your specific needs), and they
> > > haven't yet come out with any public announcements. So far, all
> > > their projects have been by word-of-mouth.
> > >
> > > The only problem is that they've got so much business right now
> > > that you may have some difficulty getting their attention. ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't want to sound like a broken record, and I don't want
> > > anyone to mistake discussions on this subject to sound like the
> > > latest spam campaign, so this is as much as I will say in public. If
> > > you want to discuss this stuff further, please e-mail me in private.
> > >
> > > --
> > > These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy
> > > =========================================================================
> > > Brad Knowles, <blk
skynet.be> Sys. Arch., Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin
> > >
> > > Note: No Microsoft programs were used in the creation or distribution of
> > > this message. If you are using a Microsoft program to view this message,
> > > be forewarned that I am not responsible for any harm you may encounter as
> > > a result.
> > >
> > > See <http://i-want-a-website.com/about-microsoft/twelve-step.html> for
> > > details.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
- Next message: Joerg Klaas: "Mails beeing merged...?"
- Previous message: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- In reply to: Rafi Sadowsky: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Next in thread: Scott Smith: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Reply: Scott Smith: "Re: maildrop & postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]