|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: more woes...new installation help
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Sat Apr 01 2000 - 04:05:49 CST
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: too many cleanup"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles <blk
skynet.be> writes:
> Let me run one of these tests on a Sun Enterprise 250 I'm working
> on configuring, and a Netra t1 (1U replacement for the Ultra
> Enterprise 5, but with SCSI disks instead of IDE), and we'll see just
> how high we can crank those numbers. I'll also run a test on a
> decent FreeBSD box I've got with softupdates enabled....
That's not exactly fair since the Linux Postfix installations run with
chattr +S (i. e. sync) /var/spool/postfix, so you'll need plain FFS
without softupdate with FreeBSD to compare things.
-- Matthias AndreeWhere do you think you're going today?
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: too many cleanup"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: more woes...new installation help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]