|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Sat Apr 01 2000 - 04:08:12 CST
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: postfix-19991231pl06 SuSe 6.3 RPMs"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthew Hawkins <matthew
topic.com.au> writes:
> As a former qmail and ezmlm+idx user, I can confirm that it was decent.
> Without the idx patches however, the only real benefit over a setup with
> majordomo or smartlist and sendmail is the qmail features of speed,
> tighter security, etc. It's very tightly integrated with qmail, so it's
> not easily "ported" to other MTA's. I don't know of anyone who has
> tried, and I'm not even sure if DJB's license permits it.
DJB's licence would permit using his original tar.gz, the user applying
patches to it before he compiles.
-- Matthias AndreeWhere do you think you're going today?
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: postfix-19991231pl06 SuSe 6.3 RPMs"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: SMTP vs Postfix's sendmail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]