|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Double logging
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandt
tu-bs.de)Date: Sat Apr 01 2000 - 06:46:44 CST
- Next message: Jim Seymour: "Re: extracting smtp traffic from logs"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: receiving mails."
- In reply to: Michael Schwager: "Double logging"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Double logging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:29:17PM -0600, Michael Schwager wrote:
> mail.debug ifdef(`LOGHOST', /expand/log/maildebuglog,
loghost)
> mail.info ifdef(`LOGHOST', /expand/log/maillog,
loghost)
The logentries of facility mail, level debug (mail.debug) INCLUDE the
logentries of facility mail, level info (mail.info).
> Should I just get rid of the mail.debug line? Will that impact syslog's
> performance at all?
Get rid of one of the two lines.
But why worry, with Win2000 everything gets better anyway :)
-- Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb All software sucks. Everybody is considered a jerk by somebody. The sun rises, the sun sets, the Sun crashes, lusers are LARTed, BOFHs get drunk. It is the way of things.
- Next message: Jim Seymour: "Re: extracting smtp traffic from logs"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: receiving mails."
- In reply to: Michael Schwager: "Double logging"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Double logging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]