|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: ETRN and delay_warning_time
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandt
tu-bs.de)Date: Sat Apr 01 2000 - 07:33:12 CST
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Header logging, revisited"
- Previous message: Jim Seymour: "Re: extracting smtp traffic from logs"
- In reply to: Daniel Roesen: "ETRN and delay_warning_time"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: ETRN and delay_warning_time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:20:20PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've set up ETRN by implementing an "etrn" transport using defer_transports.
> So far so good. I'm using delay_warning_time = 5, but this is for sure NOT
> wanted for mails which are defered because of defer_transports.
Disable it. People get enough mail already.
> Bug or feature? ;)
How to decide whether a mail is held intentionally or by "accident"?
-- Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandt
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Header logging, revisited"
- Previous message: Jim Seymour: "Re: extracting smtp traffic from logs"
- In reply to: Daniel Roesen: "ETRN and delay_warning_time"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: ETRN and delay_warning_time"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]