|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: 554
From: Ralf Hildebrandt (R.Hildebrandt
tu-bs.de)Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 09:32:14 CDT
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Previous message: Klaus Duttle: "554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- In reply to: Klaus Duttle: "554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Next in thread: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 04:14:20PM +0200, Klaus Duttle wrote:
> All mails for the domain should be relayed to a host in the inner LAN.
> But mails for the local users at the mail-server-host (root and two
> standard-user) should be delivered locally.
I'm not sure if this is possible.
> When i send a mail from internet to root
<my.ip.number> the mail will be
> bounced:
> 554 <root
62.154.176.138>: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied
> 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable
Is 62.154.176.138 in $mynetworks ?
> The postfix-FAQ
> (http://www.informatik.uni-bonn.de/pub/software/postfix/faq.html#firewall)
> contains unfortunately only a small subset of the configuration-data in
> main.cf.
It suffices.
If not, refer to the full docs.
> Also the FAQ requires for running postfix on a firewall the postfix-version
> 19991115 and later.
If you need that particular feature, you need to build from source or ask
for a RPM.
Your "special delivery" for root (I hope you've aliased root to a real
user!) and the other users makes the setup very tricky.
If I remember correctly, per user transport is not supported (yet)...
-- Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandttu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C Programs.
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Previous message: Klaus Duttle: "554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- In reply to: Klaus Duttle: "554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Next in thread: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]