|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: 554
From: Lars Hecking (lhecking
nmrc.ucc.ie)Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 09:40:37 CDT
- Next message: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralf Hildebrandt writes:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 04:14:20PM +0200, Klaus Duttle wrote:
>
> > All mails for the domain should be relayed to a host in the inner LAN.
> > But mails for the local users at the mail-server-host (root and two
> > standard-user) should be delivered locally.
>
> I'm not sure if this is possible.
It definitely was possible last time I used always_bcc on our gateway ...
> > When i send a mail from internet to root
<my.ip.number> the mail will be
> > bounced:
> > 554 <root
62.154.176.138>: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied
> > 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable
>
> Is 62.154.176.138 in $mynetworks ?
Plus, the address format is user
[IP-address]. Note the brackets.
- Next message: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: 554 <root
62.154.176.138>... Service unavailable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]