|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))
From: Bennett Todd (bet
rahul.net)Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 10:37:38 CDT
- Next message: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: Sendmail problem."
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Sendmail problem."
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))"
- Next in thread: Christopher E. Brown: "Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2000-04-13-11:17:03 Wietse Venema:
> Jonathan Bartlett:
> > [ /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory ]
>
> I would strongly recommend that this flag be set to 0, so the
> kernel gives memory only when it is known to be available.
It defaults to off in 2.2.14 and 2.3.99-pre3, so I think the key is
to refrain from turning it on:-).
-Bennett
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Next message: Jonathan Bartlett: "Re: Sendmail problem."
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Sendmail problem."
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))"
- Next in thread: Christopher E. Brown: "Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: Linux Memory Overcommits (was Re: VERY BAD performances (help !))"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]