|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: hundreds thousands email deferred
From: Brad Knowles (blk
skynet.be)Date: Thu Apr 27 2000 - 15:37:10 CDT
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: header_checks Q"
- Previous message: Michael Tokarev: "PATCH: srcaddr=address parameter for smtp client program"
- In reply to: Ben Li: "hundreds thousands email deferred"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: hundreds thousands email deferred"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: hundreds thousands email deferred"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 4:18 AM +0800 2000/4/28, Ben Li wrote:
> When I checks maillog , I've just found most mails was deferred because
> "site destination queue overflow" .
Yup. I think you need to increase the allowed size of your
active queue, and make sure that you hash the deferred and incoming
queues (two levels of hashing is probably enough), then do a "postfix
check" followed by a "postfix reload".
-- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blkskynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: header_checks Q"
- Previous message: Michael Tokarev: "PATCH: srcaddr=address parameter for smtp client program"
- In reply to: Ben Li: "hundreds thousands email deferred"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: hundreds thousands email deferred"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: hundreds thousands email deferred"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]