|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay
From: Andreas Siegert (afx
suse.de)Date: Wed May 17 2000 - 03:53:27 CDT
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: idea: content filtering"
- Previous message: furio ercolessi: "Re: RBL revisited"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Reply: Andreas Siegert: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quoting Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org) on Fri, May 12, 2000 at 09:12:33AM -0400:
> > Is it a bug or a feature when postfix (mail_version = Postfix-19990906-pl06,
> > yup, old system, time to upgrade?) adds a delivered-to header for non local
> > addresses that are handled by luser_relay?
>
> Postfix adds delivered-to when forwarding mail. This is intentional.
> The purpose of adding delivered-to is to stop mail forwarding loops.
Hmmm, but that would imply that luser_realay will never work when delivered-to
headers are switched on.
The machine that forwards it sets delivered-to: user
dom.ain and the target
host will do the same as the both feel responsibel for dom.ain.
What am I missing?
cheers
afx
--
SuSE Muenchen GmbH Phone: +49-89-42769-0
Stahlgruberring 28 Fax: +49-89-42017701
D-81829 Muenchen, Germany
May the Source be with you!
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: idea: content filtering"
- Previous message: furio ercolessi: "Re: RBL revisited"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Reply: Andreas Siegert: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Delivered-To and luser_relay"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]