|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Locking revisited
From: Liviu Daia (Liviu.Daia
imar.ro)Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 17:18:58 CDT
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Resolution to local delivery based on some other user db"
- Previous message: Liviu Daia: "Re: regexp filter won't filter: c'mon people!"
- In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Next in thread: Barton Hodges: "virtual domains without specifying users?"
- Reply: Liviu Daia: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Reply: Barton Hodges: "virtual domains without specifying users?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18 May 2000, Matthias Andree <ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> wrote:
[...]
> Still, it would be nice to get to know which locking schemes had been
> chosen at compile time (a variable to be queried with postmap such as
> mail_version would be fine).
"postconf -l", similar to "postconf -m" ?
Regards,
Liviu Daia
-- Dr. Liviu Daia e-mail: Liviu.Daiaimar.ro Institute of Mathematics web page: http://www.imar.ro/~daia of the Romanian Academy PGP key: http://www.imar.ro/~daia/daia.asc
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Resolution to local delivery based on some other user db"
- Previous message: Liviu Daia: "Re: regexp filter won't filter: c'mon people!"
- In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Next in thread: Barton Hodges: "virtual domains without specifying users?"
- Reply: Liviu Daia: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Reply: Barton Hodges: "virtual domains without specifying users?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]