|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Locking revisited
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 20:04:03 CDT
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Postfix 19991231 Patch 07 available"
- Previous message: awaddi
interlynx.net: "Re: virtual domains without specifying users?"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Liviu Daia <Liviu.Daia
imar.ro> writes:
> On 18 May 2000, Matthias Andree <ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> wrote:
> [...]
> > Still, it would be nice to get to know which locking schemes had been
> > chosen at compile time (a variable to be queried with postmap such as
> > mail_version would be fine).
>
> "postconf -l", similar to "postconf -m" ?
Exactly. It's not hard to do, but - feature freeze - it will not be in
19991231, I assume.
-- Matthias AndreeWhere do you think you're going today?
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Postfix 19991231 Patch 07 available"
- Previous message: awaddi
interlynx.net: "Re: virtual domains without specifying users?"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Locking revisited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]