|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: msn.com & service denial
From: Dick Porter (dick
acm.org)Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 04:17:06 CDT
- Next message: Russ Allbery: "Re: SMTPD banner"
- Previous message: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: SASL for fun and profit"
- In reply to: Ime Smits: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Next in thread: Vivek Khera: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Next in thread: Ronny Haryanto: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Reply: Dick Porter: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 06:11:54PM +0200, Ime Smits wrote:
> | I am a newbie to Postfix, but from what I see in my logs
> | (and in my deferred queue), postfix doesn't attempt to
> | deliver to a 'back-up' server, but defers the message
> | once it's unable to deliver to cpimssmtpe03.msn.com.
> | Is there a way around this?
>
> I am not sure what Postfix does in such a case, but I think it's reasonable
> not to contact a backup MX if a primary MX says it's resources are
> exhausted. Yes, one could deliver the mail to a secondary mx, but one can
> expact the secondary mx to eventually deliver the mail to the same primary
> mx, so contacting a secondary would only give someone else the same problem.
Yes, but this other site has (probably :-) ) agreed to take this load,
otherwise they wouldn't be a backup MX.
>
> Ime
>
- Dick
- Next message: Russ Allbery: "Re: SMTPD banner"
- Previous message: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: SASL for fun and profit"
- In reply to: Ime Smits: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Next in thread: Vivek Khera: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Next in thread: Ronny Haryanto: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Reply: Dick Porter: "Re: msn.com & service denial"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]