|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)
From: Greg Hudson (ghudson
MIT.EDU)Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 18:23:02 CDT
- Next message: Marco d'Itri: "Re: performance issues"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about file parsing"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Maybe reply: Greg Hudson: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Anyone who keeps the connection open all the time is wasting major
> resources on the server, the access system (now they have to have a
> modem for every user), and on the transport network itself.
Pardon me while I zero in on just one issue: what "major resource"
burden does an open, idle TCP connection place on the transport
network?
- Next message: Marco d'Itri: "Re: performance issues"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Question about file parsing"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Maybe reply: Greg Hudson: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]