|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: performance issues
From: Marco d'Itri (md
linux.it)Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 18:38:39 CDT
- Next message: Tan Swee Heng: "Re: AVP Daemon as content filter"
- Previous message: Greg Hudson: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Next in thread: Michael Tokarev: "Re: performance issues"
- Maybe reply: Marco d'Itri: "Re: performance issues"
- Reply: Michael Tokarev: "Re: performance issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 06, Brad Knowles <blkskynet.be> wrote:
> I'm thinking of changing these to 7000 and 65535, respectively.
>Does anyone else on this list have experience with changing these
>parameters, and could offer some advice?
The official, RFC-blessed (IANA-blessed?) range is 49152-65535.
I don't know about any adverse effect of lowering the limit.
(On linux, the sysctl file is /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range.)
-- ciao, Marco
- Next message: Tan Swee Heng: "Re: AVP Daemon as content filter"
- Previous message: Greg Hudson: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Next in thread: Michael Tokarev: "Re: performance issues"
- Maybe reply: Marco d'Itri: "Re: performance issues"
- Reply: Michael Tokarev: "Re: performance issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]