|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: performance issues
From: Michael Tokarev (mjt
tls.msk.ru)Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 06:05:52 CDT
- Next message: Richard Huxton: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Previous message: Loic Le Loarer: "Re: 554, what is it?"
- In reply to: Marco d'Itri: "Re: performance issues"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: performance issues"
- Reply: Michael Tokarev: "Re: performance issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
[]
> The official, RFC-blessed (IANA-blessed?) range is 49152-65535.
> I don't know about any adverse effect of lowering the limit.
>
> (On linux, the sysctl file is /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range.)
Do not forget that on linux, port range 61000:65096 used for ip masquerading,
and it is not configurable on run time. (This is irrelevant if you
does not use masq).
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
- Next message: Richard Huxton: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- Previous message: Loic Le Loarer: "Re: 554, what is it?"
- In reply to: Marco d'Itri: "Re: performance issues"
- Next in thread: LaMont Jones: "Re: performance issues"
- Reply: Michael Tokarev: "Re: performance issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]