|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Fake addresses
From: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw
python.org)Date: Thu Jun 08 2000 - 11:14:51 CDT
- Next message: Liviu Daia: "Re: Is postfix vulnerable to the Linux setcap bug?"
- Previous message: Mark Hoffman: "FW: schwabsignature message termination"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Fake addresses"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Fake addresses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Please CC me on followups, I'm not a member of this list. Thanks,
-BAW]
I am in the process of doing some high traffic testing of my mailing
list manager called Mailman <www.list.org>. I am using Postfix
19991231-pl07 on a RH6.1 Linux box.
I have a list that's got about 25k fake addresses and about 10 real
addresses. When I send a message to the list, I want the real
addresses to get the message, but copies destined for the fake
addresses should be just bit bucketed.
The best approach I could come up with for the fake addresses in
Postfix was to give them fake domains (e.g. `user-9922
mmtest.com')
and then create a transport file entry for those fake domains. E.g.
-------------------- snip snip --------------------
mmtest.com mmdeliver
.mmtest.com mmdeliver
-------------------- snip snip --------------------
Then in the master.cf file, I add a fake transport such as
# This is for testing Mailman. All addresses destined for
mmtest.com are
# sent through this transport, and this is the easiest way to just chuck 'em.
mmdeliver unix - n n - - pipe
user=bwarsaw argv=/bin/true
Now, this works, but it's still a huge resource drain on my system. I
can easily generate a mailq of 1M+ entries that takes over a day to
clear.
I'm wondering if there's a better way to set something like this up.
If not, then I'll probably write a simple smtp proxy for Mailman's
backend, which would sanitize those fake addresses out of the
recipients list before forwarding on to Postfix.
Thanks,
-Barry
- Next message: Liviu Daia: "Re: Is postfix vulnerable to the Linux setcap bug?"
- Previous message: Mark Hoffman: "FW: schwabsignature message termination"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Fake addresses"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Fake addresses"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]