|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: MX to localhost
From: Jesper Skriver (jesper
skriver.dk)Date: Thu Jun 08 2000 - 11:42:50 CDT
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Is postfix vulnerable to the Linux setcap bug?"
- Previous message: furio ercolessi: "Re: FW: schwabsignature message termination"
- In reply to: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: MX to localhost"
- Reply: Jesper Skriver: "Re: MX to localhost"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 07:41:03PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> Den 22-Maj-00 14:30:50 skrev Stuart Henderson følgende om "MX to localhost":
> >Has anyone already patched Postfix to treat an MX record
> >pointing at localhost/127.0.0.1 as non-existent? It would be
> >a nice addition to the UCE controls.
>
> I supposed you might want to treat the reserved IP ranges similiarily.
No, atleast it's much more instrusive, as people with split dns, might
have internal mail hosts with rfc1918 addresses.
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network managerAS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek
AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Is postfix vulnerable to the Linux setcap bug?"
- Previous message: furio ercolessi: "Re: FW: schwabsignature message termination"
- In reply to: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: MX to localhost"
- Reply: Jesper Skriver: "Re: MX to localhost"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]