|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support
From: Alexander Nosenko (nae
titul.ru)Date: Fri Jun 09 2000 - 00:05:29 CDT
- Next message: Liviu Daia: "Re: Is postfix vulnerable to the Linux setcap bug?"
- Previous message: Amos Gouaux: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- In reply to: Daniel Meredith: "pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Next in thread: Piotr Klaban: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Reply: Alexander Nosenko: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Reply: Piotr Klaban: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Meredith <dman
madcat.investimg.com>
To: Postfix users <postfix-users
postfix.org>
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 4:13 AM
Subject: pop-before-smtp qpopper support
>I thought this may be of some interest to those currently using Qpopper
instead
>of the UW pop/imap servers
Hi!
(slightly offtopic) note: all maillog-watching-Perl-script based
pop-before-smtp implementations I saw have (small) common problem: they
don't track maillog rotation. The script should be stopped/restarted in
/etc/logrotate.d/syslog or somewhere or syslogd should be configured to
rotate maillog "inplace".
While it's a small inconvenience (at most) it isn't mentioned in docs.
First-time user can step on it (I did) and cut off smtp service at 4.00
Sunday ;-)
Can you Perl gurus invent some workaround better than (unelegant and
unsupported on older systems) pipe to
tail -follow=name ...
please?
>I realize that some prefer to use DRAC to accomplish the same
>thing, but I would rather give more CPU to running a perl script than open
up
>portmapper on my machines.
I remember DRAC can be configured to use unix domain sockets (am I right?).
Open portmapper is ...ugh... unpleasant.
Regards,
Alexander Nosenko <nae
titul.ru>
--- If 2 * 2 = 3.978 it's a bug. If 2 * 2 = 5 it's a feature. If 2 * 2 = 4 it's a user's manual.
- Next message: Liviu Daia: "Re: Is postfix vulnerable to the Linux setcap bug?"
- Previous message: Amos Gouaux: "Re: pop-before-smtp (was Re: FreeInet and checking mail?)"
- In reply to: Daniel Meredith: "pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Next in thread: Piotr Klaban: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Reply: Alexander Nosenko: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Reply: Piotr Klaban: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: pop-before-smtp qpopper support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]