|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: dnscache
From: Brad Knowles (blk
skynet.be)Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 10:54:06 CDT
- Next message: Jim Holthaus: "UPPER case virtual domain"
- Previous message: Lars Hecking: "Re: amavis with postfix?"
- In reply to: Bennett Todd: "Re: dnscache"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: dnscache"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: dnscache"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: dnscache"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 2:35 PM -0400 2000/6/13, Bennett Todd wrote:
> Tinydns only
> serves UDP, since that's all that's needed to return authoritative
> data to currently-used recursive resolvers.
Not true. Take any of the previously mentioned examples of
exceeding the 512 byte limit of UDP, and note that all UDP queries
that result in truncation must be retried with TCP.
If it doesn't serve both TCP and UDP, then it doesn't serve the
DNS properly -- period.
-- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blkskynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium
- Next message: Jim Holthaus: "UPPER case virtual domain"
- Previous message: Lars Hecking: "Re: amavis with postfix?"
- In reply to: Bennett Todd: "Re: dnscache"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: dnscache"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: dnscache"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: dnscache"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]