|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: firtname.lastname handling, and handling unknown recipients
From: Matthias Andree (ma
dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 19:37:36 CDT
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: mail deliveries to NFS mount (sort of)"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: dnscache"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: firtname.lastname handling, and handling unknown recipients"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Darren Nickerson <darren.nickerson
iworkwell.com> writes:
> Since the machine I'm setting up will only host one domain, it makes
> sense to simply add it to mydestination and setup aliases accordingly,
> and forget about virtual maps for now (I think). I have two questions
> in this context:
>
> 1. what is the best way to handle firstname.lastname -> username
> rewriting for inbound mail? Aliases? Or is a more heavy-handed
> approach like using canonical maps to munge the actual headers
> seen as a more appropriate way of handling this?
Depends on what you're doing with it and what you need it for. Aliases
set up routing only, canonical_maps set up simple rewriting. If you're
forwarding things (I know you do), it depends on what the destination
expects.
> 2. is there a way to duplicate the functionality of the
> "catch-all" feature of a
mydomain.com line in virtual map,
> which would send all unknown mail to a given local user? Is the
> luser_relay the best way to do this?
I never thought about that one, I'm not researching this since I'm short
of time ATM.
-- Matthias AndreeWhere do you think you're going today?
- Next message: Matthias Andree: "Re: mail deliveries to NFS mount (sort of)"
- Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: dnscache"
- Maybe reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: firtname.lastname handling, and handling unknown recipients"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]