|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Preventing email abuse
From: Marco d'Itri (md
linux.it)Date: Mon Jun 19 2000 - 18:29:44 CDT
- Next message: Robin Whittle: "Web - email software round-up"
- Previous message: Jeremy Lunn: "Re: Sending mail with different domain names"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Reply: Marco d'Itri: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 20, Wietse Venema <wietse
porcupine.org> wrote:
>So, what smart solution do you recommend? One should not be a guru
>in order to set up Postfix. Using the netmask will break already
>existing installations (and would not make sense for cable modems).
IMHO relaying for just the /24 even for A and B class addresses
is a good compromise.
I understand that this could break some existing installations, but I
also think those who really have to set up a relay for a real /8 or /16
will know how to read access(5) and RELEASE_NOTES.
-- ciao, Marco
- Next message: Robin Whittle: "Web - email software round-up"
- Previous message: Jeremy Lunn: "Re: Sending mail with different domain names"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Reply: Marco d'Itri: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Preventing email abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]