|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)
From: Thomas Roessler (roessler
does-not-exist.org)Date: Wed Jun 21 2000 - 16:20:34 CDT
- Next message: Ian! D. Allen [NCFreeNet]: "Re: mapping local addresses on outgoing (Internet) mail only"
- Previous message: Greg Hudson: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- In reply to: Liviu Daia: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Reply: Thomas Roessler: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2000-06-21 23:51:50 +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> On a second thought, there's also another way to
> look at it: in MIME-related legalese, the body of a
> message is an attachment, and "Content-Length" is an
> attribute of that attachment. [*Sigh*] Whoever invented
> 7-bit channels and their logical consequence content
> encoding, deserves to die a slow, painful death.
Could you give a reference? I don't seem to be able to
find the spec in question.
Thanks.
- Next message: Ian! D. Allen [NCFreeNet]: "Re: mapping local addresses on outgoing (Internet) mail only"
- Previous message: Greg Hudson: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- In reply to: Liviu Daia: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Reply: Thomas Roessler: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]