|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix.
From: Mark Hoffman (mark.hoffman
wallst.com)Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 16:46:33 CDT
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Maybe in reply to: Mark Hoffman: "1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Maybe reply: Mark Hoffman: "RE: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That was a machine in production that I set to not send email for debugging.
I'm actually sending 250,000 emails a day, so we fill up the junk command
counter pretty quickly on the mailservers. Is there a way to reset the junk
command counter? Why is noop considered a junk command? Can I change this?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: wietse
porcupine.org [mailto:wietse
porcupine.org]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 5:40 PM
To: postfix-users
postfix.org
Subject: Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix.
Mark Hoffman:
> I set the service to noop every 2 seconds to reproduce the problem.
>
> I guess the real problem is that even after a successful delivery, the
> response is still slow. We are seeing this behavior even while sending
email
> in the middle of the 1012 noops. i.e. If we send 500 noops, then an email,
> Then more noops, response gets slow at ~1030 noops total. So it seems the
> successful email doesn't reset the session record, when a constant
> connection is maintained.
Successful delivery resets the session recording.
Successful delivery does NOT reset the junk command counter.
> In our production environment, we see this behavior after ~ 3 days.
Granted,
> NT usually has to be rebooted more often than that, but I've finally
gotten
> my service to run for a couple of weeks at a stretch. And, because of the
> load on the gateways between the NT servers and the Postfix servers, I
want
> to noop to make sure the connection is still there before sending mail.
Why bother keeping the connection open?
If you send 1000 NOOPs in 3 days, that means your NT client makes
less than one delivery every four minutes.
Wietse
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Content-Length (was Re: Banner)"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Maybe in reply to: Mark Hoffman: "1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Maybe reply: Mark Hoffman: "RE: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]