|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix.
From: Mark Hoffman (mark.hoffman
wallst.com)Date: Mon Jun 26 2000 - 16:24:24 CDT
- Next message: Daniel Meredith: "POP before SMTP: qpopper"
- Previous message: Iain Smith: "unsubscribe"
- Maybe in reply to: Mark Hoffman: "1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Maybe reply: Mark Hoffman: "RE: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks very much!
-----Original Message-----
From: wietse
porcupine.org [mailto:wietse
porcupine.org]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 7:42 PM
To: postfix-users
postfix.org
Subject: Re: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix.
Wietse Venema:
> Now, there can be made an argument that the junk counter should be
> reset after successful delivery, just like the error status flag.
Patch follows.
Wietse
*** ./smtpd.c- Sat Jun 3 08:32:12 2000
--- ./smtpd.c Fri Jun 23 19:39:42 2000
***************
*** 911,916 ****
--- 911,917 ----
if (state->err == CLEANUP_STAT_OK) {
state->error_count = 0;
state->error_mask = 0;
+ state->junk_cmds = 0;
smtpd_chat_reply(state, "250 Ok: queued as %s", state->queue_id);
} else if ((state->err & CLEANUP_STAT_BAD) != 0) {
state->error_mask |= MAIL_ERROR_SOFTWARE;
- Next message: Daniel Meredith: "POP before SMTP: qpopper"
- Previous message: Iain Smith: "unsubscribe"
- Maybe in reply to: Mark Hoffman: "1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Maybe reply: Mark Hoffman: "RE: 1012 noops in a row cause slow responses from Postfix."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]