|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime
From: Jürgen Fluk (j.fluk
ntm-gmbh.de)Date: Fri Jun 30 2000 - 15:29:56 CDT
- Next message: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: 451 Error: queue file write error"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain flawed?"
- Next in thread: Daniel Roesen: "Re: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime"
- Reply: Daniel Roesen: "Re: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Standard header: I searched all FAQs and DOCs and MLs ...]
Our configuration sets "maximal_queue_lifetime" to one day only
so that users do get fast error reports. I think most sites will
recover within one day after crashes or network disruption.
Now I want to defer messages to a site being offline for several
days, maybe even more than one week. No bounces. Thought of using
"defer_transports", but I'm not sure whether messages queued there
are bounced after waiting "maximal_queue_lifetime"?
If yes, what is the Right Way to defer them?
louis
-- Jürgen Fluk louisntm-gmbh.de New Technologies Management GmbH Tel +49 89 993415-56 Stefan-George-Ring 24, D-81929 München Fax +49 89 993415-99
- Next message: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: 451 Error: queue file write error"
- Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: reject_unknown_sender_domain flawed?"
- Next in thread: Daniel Roesen: "Re: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime"
- Reply: Daniel Roesen: "Re: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: defer_transports and maximal_queue_lifetime"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]