OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: Re: null reverse-path
From: Ronny Haryanto (ronny-postfixharyan.to)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 21:51:30 CDT

On 04-Jul-2000, adi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 01:03:03AM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> > "MUST"
> >
> > This word or the adjective "REQUIRED" means that the item
> > is an absolute requirement of the specification.
> >
> > Which particular part of the word "must" do you not understand?
>
>
> these are what you mean? C'mon :-)
>
> Send error notification msg after accept |5.3.3 |x| | | | |
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I don't think so. About ten lines above it it says:
    Support empty reverse path |5.2.9 |x| | | | |

And it's under RECEIVER-SMTP.

I'm 100% convinced now that receiver-SMTP not supporting null
reverse-path DOES break the RFC.

Thank you for your analysis, gentlemen.

Ronny