|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: finally worked, but how to explain test?
From: Lutz Jaenicke (Lutz.Jaenicke
aet.TU-Cottbus.DE)Date: Tue Jul 04 2000 - 08:54:37 CDT
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Full queue and postfix dies"
- Previous message: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: wrong ip blocking?"
- In reply to: Mipam: "finally worked, but how to explain test?"
- Next in thread: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: wrong ip blocking?"
- Reply: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: finally worked, but how to explain test?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:45:27PM +0200, Mipam wrote:
> Btw i did the smtp-source test:
>
> /usr/bin/time ./smtp-source -m1000 -s20 -l15360 -c -tnull
localhost localhost
>
> output:
>
> 1000
> 83.42 real 1.41 user 3.12 sys
>
> Now, very nice and so, postfix is having a nice time bouncing all cause
> the user null doesnt exist of course. Anyway, i am to stupid right now
> to explain the results the right way. What do these results say?
man time
Your test took 83.42 seconds real time (the time you can see on your wrist
watch) and the program smtp-source consumed 5.63 CPU seconds, 1.41 CPU seconds
in user mode and 3.12 CPU seconds on kernel operations.
Best regards,
Lutz
-- Lutz Jaenicke Lutz.Jaenickeaet.TU-Cottbus.DE BTU Cottbus http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/ Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Tel. +49 355 69-4129 Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus Fax. +49 355 69-4153
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Full queue and postfix dies"
- Previous message: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: wrong ip blocking?"
- In reply to: Mipam: "finally worked, but how to explain test?"
- Next in thread: Matthew Hawkins: "Re: wrong ip blocking?"
- Reply: Lutz Jaenicke: "Re: finally worked, but how to explain test?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]