|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Large job submissions
From: Francisco Reyes (fran
reyes.somos.net)Date: Wed Jul 05 2000 - 20:35:26 CDT
- Next message: scott: "Re: MySQL: database stress and performance questions"
- Previous message: Glen Lee Edwards: "Re: "Selective" Relaying (was: Re: Sendmail vs Postfix)"
- Maybe in reply to: Francisco Reyes: "Large job submissions"
- Maybe reply: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Large job submissions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 03:06:15 -0500 (CDT), Jonathan Bartlett
wrote:
>I don't think that there is any way to bring a machine to a halt
>using Postfix like you can with sendmail.
That is very good news.
I will do some testing, but I am leaning towards trying between
50 and 100 SMTP agents.
>Also, these mails are dynamically generated, so each is a separate message,
>while you are probably just sending one message with 20,000 recipients.
>Jon
Ours are also dynamically generated.
We control the program that submits the emails. Will it help if
we put a small pause every 100 or 1000 emails? What pause would
help? Is there even a way to measure this? (i.e. messages in
que so I can see how well we are keeping up with the program
sending the emails).
francisco
- Next message: scott: "Re: MySQL: database stress and performance questions"
- Previous message: Glen Lee Edwards: "Re: "Selective" Relaying (was: Re: Sendmail vs Postfix)"
- Maybe in reply to: Francisco Reyes: "Large job submissions"
- Maybe reply: Francisco Reyes: "Re: Large job submissions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]