|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Sending mail
From: Pierre MONDIE (pm
cti.ecp.fr)Date: Thu Jul 06 2000 - 03:44:18 CDT
- Next message: furio ercolessi: "Re: Sending mail"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Backoff from unreachable hosts"
- Maybe in reply to: Raghav Ramesh: "Sending mail"
- Next in thread: furio ercolessi: "Re: Sending mail"
- Maybe reply: Pierre MONDIE: "Re: Sending mail"
- Reply: furio ercolessi: "Re: Sending mail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, David Terrell wrote:
> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 00:22:21 -0700
> To: Pierre MONDIE <pm
cti.ecp.fr>
> From: David Terrell <dbt
meat.net>
>
> >
> > Strictly speaking, there is no way to enforce this with SMTP only,
> whatever
> > software you plan to use : blame SMTP design for this.
>
> This is not particularly true. SMTP has SASL extensions and I
> believe Postfix supports them. This can include user authentication
> with a password.
>
Thanks for the message : I took some time to check this and found out that
you are right and I was wrong : these extensions are documented in :
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2554.txt
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2831.txt
And are definitively a better method than POP-berfore-SMTP hacks.
Sendmail 8.11 seems to support all this, but I did not find in any public
postfix documentation mention of support for these interesting features.
- Next message: furio ercolessi: "Re: Sending mail"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Backoff from unreachable hosts"
- Maybe in reply to: Raghav Ramesh: "Sending mail"
- Next in thread: furio ercolessi: "Re: Sending mail"
- Maybe reply: Pierre MONDIE: "Re: Sending mail"
- Reply: furio ercolessi: "Re: Sending mail"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]