|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Benchmarking Command sequence
From: Lars Hecking (lhecking
nmrc.ie)Date: Thu Jul 06 2000 - 11:23:57 CDT
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> My results are that it's between 15x (100 messages of 1000 bytes) and 2.3x
> (500 messages of 500k size) faster than postfix/amavis-perl/AVP daemon.
>
> The process creation overhead really slows Amavis down :(
I observed that, regardless the setting of vscan_destination_concurrency_limit
or vscan_destination_recipient_limit, one instance of amavis is started for
every recipient, but I won't have the time to debug this before my
holidays ...
> Tomorrow I'll give MaCoFiDa a try -- comments?
Let us know about your results :)
- Next message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Reply: Lars Hecking: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Benchmarking Command sequence"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]