|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: isocor versus postfix
From: Len Conrad (lconrad
Go2France.com)Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 03:17:56 CDT
- Next message: Mailing Manager: "the last test froma mail-abuse.org was succesfull"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Hopeless newbie postfix questions (open public/pickup: Device not configured)"
- In reply to: valery brasseur: "isocor versus postfix"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: isocor versus postfix"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: isocor versus postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 09:46 11/08/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Did someone have compare Isocor with Postfix ?
>
>Valery
Postfix is, exclusively, a lean-and-mean MTA. Isocor's product line seems
to be much more ambitious, which includes a mail-relay function among many
other functions.
What are you looking for?
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8.2.2 p5 installable binary for NT4
http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways
- Next message: Mailing Manager: "the last test froma mail-abuse.org was succesfull"
- Previous message: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: Hopeless newbie postfix questions (open public/pickup: Device not configured)"
- In reply to: valery brasseur: "isocor versus postfix"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: isocor versus postfix"
- Reply: Len Conrad: "Re: isocor versus postfix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]