|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured
From: Michael Tokarev (mjt
tls.msk.ru)Date: Wed Aug 16 2000 - 11:53:57 CDT
- Next message: Michael Tokarev: "Re: More virtuals incompatabilities"
- Previous message: Chuck Dale: "Re: More virtuals incompatabilities"
- In reply to: Chuck Dale: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Michael Tokarev: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Reply: Michael Tokarev: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chuck Dale wrote:
>
[]
> The reject came after the RCPT was sent even though I had
> reject_unknown_hostname in smtpd_client_restrictions.
This is the smtpd_delay_reject = yes parameter.
If it is set (the default), any rejection will be delayed
untill RCPT TO will be issued. If you set
smtpd_delay_reject = no (as I did), then negative answer
will be issued immediately, namely:
right after connect, for client_restrictions
after HELO/EHLO, for helo_restrictions
(or after first command _not_ HELO/EHLO, if
smtpd_helo_required also set to yes)
after MAIL FROM, for sender_restrictions, and
after RCPT TO, for recipient_restrictions.
With default smtpd_delay_reject = yes, it does not
matter where to place restrictions -- them all can be
specified in recipient_restrictions, or spread
across others -- since negative reply delayed to RCPT TO.
But if smtpd_delay_reject = no, things are different.
I set it to no to immediately show the difference.
Wow, -- maybe this was a cause also? When smtpd delays
reject, maybe invalid_hostname has meaning in
client_restrictions!? ;)
Regards,
Michael.
- Next message: Michael Tokarev: "Re: More virtuals incompatabilities"
- Previous message: Chuck Dale: "Re: More virtuals incompatabilities"
- In reply to: Chuck Dale: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Michael Tokarev: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Reply: Michael Tokarev: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]