|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured
From: Rudi van Houten (R.vanHouten
math.uu.nl)Date: Thu Aug 17 2000 - 06:38:09 CDT
- Next message: Linh Huynh: "postfix instead of sendmail"
- Previous message: Barry W Anderson: "Re: Mail server on linux..."
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Reply: Rudi van Houten: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 11:14:45AM +0000, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2000 18:52:16 +0200, Michael Tokarev <mjt
tls.msk.ru> wrote:
>
> >This is the smtpd_delay_reject = yes parameter.
> >If it is set (the default), any rejection will be delayed
> >untill RCPT TO will be issued.
>
> This way you can gather useful information about the crap they're trying to
> send and ...
>
> > If you set
> >smtpd_delay_reject = no (as I did), then negative answer
> >will be issued immediately, namely:
> > right after connect, for client_restrictions
> > after HELO/EHLO, for helo_restrictions
> > (or after first command _not_ HELO/EHLO, if
> > smtpd_helo_required also set to yes)
> > after MAIL FROM, for sender_restrictions, and
> > after RCPT TO, for recipient_restrictions.
>
> ...even the dumbest spammailer will accept a 5xx error after RCPT TO: (some
> try again if they get rejected right at the connect)
>
Some spammers even go on sending after postfix sent the 5xx error
in reply to RCPT TO:, I think the spam program does not look at the
reply codes.
--
Rudi van Houten Department of Mathematics Utrecht University
Budapestlaan 8 - 3584 CD - Utrecht - Netherlands
:-) Fantasy is given mankind to make amends for what he is not,
and a sense of humour as consolation for what he is.
- Next message: Linh Huynh: "postfix instead of sendmail"
- Previous message: Barry W Anderson: "Re: Mail server on linux..."
- In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Next in thread: Liviu Daia: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Reply: Rudi van Houten: "Re: smtpd_helo_restrictions not being honoured"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]