OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: Re: Virtual Domains question
From: Andrew Houghton (aahacm.org)
Date: Sun Aug 20 2000 - 20:37:55 CDT

I've received one personal reply, and one list reply, both of which
suggested options requiring pam_ldap. I should have mentioned this before,
but I'm using FreeBSD 4.1, which has no usable pam_ldap implementation. Any
other thoughts?

Thanks for the suggestions so far,

Andrew

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Svazas" <mykdnagraphics.com.au>
To: "Andrew Houghton" <aahacm.org>; "postfix-users"
<postfix-userspostfix.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: Virtual Domains question

> Quoting Andrew Houghton <aahacm.org>:
>
> > ...
> > But I don't understand what to put in for the ???. I want to allow
> > people
> > to use a pop3 server to get their mail from mail.hostedsite.foo, but I
> > don't
> > necessarily want them to actually exist as system users.. I'm a little
> > confused.
> >...
> >
> > - Andrew
> >
>
> check out http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/
>
> this is from the server overview page on the above page
> <QUOTE>
> A full Cyrus IMAP implementation allows a seamless mail and bulletin board
> environment to be set up across multiple servers. It differs from other
IMAP
> server implementations in that it is run on "sealed" servers, where users
are
> not normally permitted to log in. The mailbox database is stored in parts
of
> the filesystem that are private to the Cyrus IMAP system. All user access
to
> mail is through software using the IMAP, POP3, or KPOP protocols.
> </QUOTE>
>
> another link worth looking at is:
> http://www.oswg.org/oswg-nightly/oswg/en_US.ISO_8859-1/articles/exchange-
> replacement-howto/exchange-replacement-howto.html
>
> (that's one URL... sorry if it breaks in the middle)
>
> the problem with the exchange-rep-howto is that it's written for sendmail,
but
> contains info on using cyrus and ldap. i was actually thinking of asking
> someone on the list if they thought it be difficult to implement using
postfix.
>
>