|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Incessant Bounces
From: Brad Knowles (blk
skynet.be)Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 01:53:20 CDT
- Next message: Chuck Dale: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- In reply to: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Next in thread: Alexander Nosenko: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Next in thread: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Reply: Alexander Nosenko: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Reply: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 6:10 PM -0400 2000/8/23, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Then your mailer is BROKEN! My mailers (and I include both instances of
> Postfix as well as other mailers that I administer) do not ever lose
> mail in this case. Not *EVER*.
Perhaps from the perspective of the RFCs, bounced mail is not
lost mail. However, you have to bounce the bounces with a null
envelope sender, otherwise you will get a loop. And if the double
bounce fails, the result just gets thrown away -- the mail is never
received, the bounce is never received, and the sender never finds
out what happened.
However, I can tell you from personal experience that from the
perspective of the users, unnecessarily bounced mail *is* lost as far
as they are concerned, and in this matter, their opinion is the only
one that counts.
I can't fix their mail server to generate warnings when messages
aren't received within a millisecond of being transmitted, but I can
at least set up our mail servers so that we give the best chance
possible for a transmitted mail message to be received by our
customers.
If I wasn't going to do that, we might as well turn down our
queue holding time to ten minutes, and bounce everything that can't
be delivered within that window -- since by your rules a bounced
message is not a lost message, this would be okay.
-- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blkskynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
- Next message: Chuck Dale: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- In reply to: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Next in thread: Alexander Nosenko: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Next in thread: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Reply: Alexander Nosenko: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Reply: Greg A. Woods: "Re: Incessant Bounces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]