|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: virtual domains
From: Thomas Andres (tandres
vis.ethz.ch)Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 10:00:30 CDT
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: info requested"
- Previous message: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- In reply to: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- Next in thread: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- Reply: Thomas Andres: "Re: virtual domains"
- Reply: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Nothe that Chris have a catch-all entry for that domain (underlined by
> me),
> so that there will be no non-existant users at all.
>
> I don't know if it is ok for virtual map to have such an entries,
> but you can have recipient map for this purpose, like this:
I think it would also be possible to write
unwanted
domain.com nonexisting-local-user
Then postfix would try local delivery, fail to find the user and bounce
the mail.
Bye
Thomas
-- "What are you doing?""Examining the world's major religions. I'm looking for something that's light on morals, has lots of holidays, and with a short initiation period."
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: info requested"
- Previous message: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- In reply to: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- Next in thread: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- Reply: Thomas Andres: "Re: virtual domains"
- Reply: Michael Ju. Tokarev: "Re: virtual domains"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]