|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)
From: Wietse Venema (wietse
porcupine.org)Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 19:53:55 CDT
- Next message: Chuck Dale: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- In reply to: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "RE: info requested"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles:
> > That is, twice the peak load capacity. So we're basically saying the
> > same thing, in different words.
>
> I believe that you want to keep at least 2x capacity at all
> times, whereas I believe you said that you should keep 10x.
Ahem, I recommended a capacity of 10x the AVERAGE load.
Wietse
- Next message: Chuck Dale: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Previous message: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- In reply to: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "RE: info requested"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "Re: Headroom (was RE: info requested)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]