|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: virtusertable incompatabilities
From: Chuck Dale (bug
aphid.net)Date: Thu Aug 24 2000 - 21:33:23 CDT
- Next message: Karen Ellrick: "RE: Broken SMTP Notifications in Postfix RPMs"
- Previous message: Chuck Dale: "Re: Broken SMTP Notifications in Postfix RPMs"
- In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Reply: Chuck Dale: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wrote Matthias Andree on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 06:45:58PM +0200:
> Chuck Dale <bug
aphid.net> writes:
>
> > Which used to seem like the perfectly normal and standard way of doing
> > things before I entered Postfixworld.
>
> Which is the normal biassed-by-the-traditions way of perceiving mail
> systems. "Sendmail is The Right Way To Do It, any deviation is
> strange". Not. Postfix is more nicely separating the functionalities.
>
> You might also be thinking configuring and operating name servers would
> be a major hassle and a major security problem... until DJBDNS was
> released. (Yes, this is both a subliminal and an obvious
> recommendation.)
Ooh yum.
Wait a minute. I guess it comes complete with Nutty Dan License?
*pause to search on google, look at site*
Not again!
Still, does look very cool.
Chuck
[ charles hamilton dale <bug
aphid.net> ]
- Next message: Karen Ellrick: "RE: Broken SMTP Notifications in Postfix RPMs"
- Previous message: Chuck Dale: "Re: Broken SMTP Notifications in Postfix RPMs"
- In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Reply: Chuck Dale: "Re: virtusertable incompatabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]