|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: specifying unknown users
From: Marc Martinez (lastxit+postfix-users
technogeeks.org)Date: Thu Sep 14 2000 - 11:39:46 CDT
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: postfix and different character sets"
- Previous message: Harry Palmer: "postfix and different character sets"
- In reply to: Yanek Korff: "RE: specifying unknown users"
- Next in thread: brian moore: "Re: specifying unknown users"
- Reply: Marc Martinez: "Re: specifying unknown users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:22:12PM -0400, Yanek Korff wrote:
> Is this done in the transport.db? So for every user that does not exist I'd
> say
> user
mydomain.com error:551
>
> Or would I have to put in my own error as in:
>
> user
mycomdain.com error: User (can I use a variable here?) does not
> exist.
>
> I'd certainly prefer to specify invalid users than specify valid users.
The method I referred to is via the "access" maps, whatever you may name
them.. firstly, see 'man 5 access' for details on the format, and for
reference here's a couple lines I use to reject invalid usernames:
1
hippie.com 551 Clueless luser. That fool ain't here.
123
hippie.com 551 Clueless luser. That fool ain't here.
on a 'rcpt to:' command this generates an error response of the form:
rcpt to: <123
hippie.com>
551 <123
hippie.com>: Recipient address rejected: Clueless luser. That fool ain't here.
Marc
- Next message: Wietse Venema: "Re: postfix and different character sets"
- Previous message: Harry Palmer: "postfix and different character sets"
- In reply to: Yanek Korff: "RE: specifying unknown users"
- Next in thread: brian moore: "Re: specifying unknown users"
- Reply: Marc Martinez: "Re: specifying unknown users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]