|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: stupid simple question
From: Jim Seymour (jseymour
LinxNet.com)Date: Fri Sep 22 2000 - 19:16:57 CDT
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: Linux Journal article (Postfix)"
- Previous message: Jeff Bronson: "stupid simple question"
- In reply to: Jeff Bronson: "stupid simple question"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: stupid simple question"
- Reply: Jim Seymour: "Re: stupid simple question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff Bronson <jeff
sparc-central.com> wrote:
>
> In the below UCE controls, which rule causes: DOMAIN NOT FOUND
> (usually IPs that have no reverse on them....)
>
> Is it reject_unknown_client?
[snip]
Likely reject_unknown_sender_domain or reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
I expect.
IMO, reject_unknown_client would be great were it not for so many
perfectly valid clients with no rDNS. So I don't use it. I do use the
other two.
Regards,
Jim
-- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymourLinxNet.com | http://www.cam.ac.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html http://home.msen.com/~jimsun | http://www.trustcenter.de/cgi-bin/SearchCert.cgi
- Next message: Lars Hecking: "Re: Linux Journal article (Postfix)"
- Previous message: Jeff Bronson: "stupid simple question"
- In reply to: Jeff Bronson: "stupid simple question"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: stupid simple question"
- Reply: Jim Seymour: "Re: stupid simple question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]