|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: RE: ETRN too fast!
From: Doug Clements (dsclements
linkline.com)Date: Tue Sep 26 2000 - 13:53:17 CDT
- Next message: Bennett Todd: "Re: POP befor SMTP using DRACD"
- Previous message: michael
aspen.genomix.tech2020.org: "virtual hosts sanity check"
- In reply to: Brad Knowles: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Mark Huizer: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Doug Clements: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Mark Huizer: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Well, it's not really his job to wait for our mail server. We typically have
2-3 thousand mails in the queue at any given time, so it does take a few
minutes to run the queue. His 5 minute idle-timeout isn't enough, and we
have increased it temporarily to get him going, but it doesn't seem like the
correct solution.
--Doug Clements, LinkLine Communications
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-postfix-users
postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-users
postfix.org]On Behalf Of Brad Knowles
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 10:32 AM
> To: dsclements
linkline.com; postfix-users
cloud9.net; Vivek Khera
> Subject: Re: ETRN too fast!
>
>
> At 9:52 AM -0700 2000/9/26, Doug Clements wrote:
>
> > I want him to be able to run ETRNs, I just want the smtp session to
> > slow him down so he doesn't disconnect before his messages get run.
>
> I don't understand why he just doesn't have the router or machine
> configured to keep the line up for at least five minutes after the
> last communication that passed through it. If you don't tear down
> the line the instant you are done transmitting your packets, this
> gives other things a chance to happen before the line is disconnected.
>
> Fundamentally, I don't see a way to solve this problem without
> having the customer fix their configuration.
>
> --
> These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
> ======================================================================
> Brad Knowles, <blk
skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV
> Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124
> Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels
> http://www.skynet.be || Belgium
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
>
>
- Next message: Bennett Todd: "Re: POP befor SMTP using DRACD"
- Previous message: michael
aspen.genomix.tech2020.org: "virtual hosts sanity check"
- In reply to: Brad Knowles: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Mark Huizer: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Doug Clements: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Mark Huizer: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Brad Knowles: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]