|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: ETRN too fast!
From: Mark Huizer (xaa+postfix
timewasters.nl)Date: Tue Sep 26 2000 - 14:45:56 CDT
- Next message: Brad Knowles: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: POP befor SMTP using DRACD"
- In reply to: Doug Clements: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Mark Huizer: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The wise Doug Clements produced the following lines:
> Well, it's not really his job to wait for our mail server. We typically have
> 2-3 thousand mails in the queue at any given time, so it does take a few
> minutes to run the queue. His 5 minute idle-timeout isn't enough, and we
> have increased it temporarily to get him going, but it doesn't seem like the
> correct solution.
>
Postfix in its current form is just not fit for that kind of delivery.
Parts of the queue management should be rewritten and Wietse has made it
rather clear he thinks that's not a good thing to do.
The place where I worked, uses postfix everywhere, except on the box
doing smtp queuing. From what I hear from Brad Knowles, the same goes
for his site.
mark
- Next message: Brad Knowles: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Previous message: Bennett Todd: "Re: POP befor SMTP using DRACD"
- In reply to: Doug Clements: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Brad Knowles: "RE: ETRN too fast!"
- Next in thread: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Mark Huizer: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: ETRN too fast!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]