|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets
From: +archive.postfix-users
utdallas.eduDate: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 00:11:47 CDT
- Next message: +archive.postfix-users
utdallas.edu: "Re: OpenLDAP 2.0.6, Postfix 20001005"
- Previous message: Drew Bloechl: "Re: Postfix sending on port 25 but listening on a different port?"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets"
- Next in thread: Ørnulf Nielsen: "Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets"
- Reply: +archive.postfix-users
utdallas.edu: "Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Does that mean the unified, local connect stuff is looming on the not
so distant horizon? That would sure be swell. :)
-- AmosOn Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Thanks. I'll see if I can re-use a bit of the unix_connect code, > that simplifies things a bit. > > Wietse > > Content-Description: > > [Attachment, skipping...] > > Lyndon Nerenberg: > > Ah crap ... sorry folks, that first patch won't build on Solaris. This one > > has the namaspace collisions fixed. > > > > --lyndon > >
- Next message: +archive.postfix-users
utdallas.edu: "Re: OpenLDAP 2.0.6, Postfix 20001005"
- Previous message: Drew Bloechl: "Re: Postfix sending on port 25 but listening on a different port?"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets"
- Next in thread: Ørnulf Nielsen: "Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets"
- Reply: +archive.postfix-users
utdallas.edu: "Re: LMTP delivery over named sockets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]