|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c
From: Jonathan Ellis (jellis
advocast.com)Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 17:01:16 CDT
- Next message: Richard Furda: "rbl_domains"
- Previous message: Ben C.O.Grimm: "Re: spammit.com (formerly ban based on MX)"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Reply: Jonathan Ellis: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> If advocast.com is listed in mydestination and not in a transport
> map entry, then there is no way that Postfix can pass mail for
> anyone
advocast.com to the smtp client. This is exactly how thousands
> of sites must be using Postfix.
Well, I added
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
to main.cf, and postmap-ed a transport file of
advocast.com local:
and I am getting the same results as I was before: All mail to
non-advocast.com domains tries and fails to go through mail.advocast.com.
Maybe I am mis-understanding?
-Jonathan
- Next message: Richard Furda: "rbl_domains"
- Previous message: Ben C.O.Grimm: "Re: spammit.com (formerly ban based on MX)"
- In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Next in thread: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Reply: Jonathan Ellis: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: virtual domains and hacking smtp_addr.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]